# Attestation¶

Graphene is typically used to create and run Trusted Execution Environments (TEE). A very important aspect of a TEE is Attestation. Broadly speaking, attestation is a mechanism for a remote user to verify that the application runs on a real hardware in an up-to-date TEE with the expected initial state.

There are two types of attestation: Local Attestation and Remote Attestation. Local attestation is used when two TEEs run on the same physical machine and remote attestation is used when a user attests a TEE running on a remote physical machine. In the following, we discuss only Remote Attestation. Moreover, even though Graphene attestation flows are designed to be TEE-agnostic, we discuss only SGX remote attestation flows (the SGX flows are currently the only ones implemented).

By itself, attestation only provides the assurance to the user that the remotely executing TEE is trusted, that the correct code is executed and that the data is processed securely. In addition to this assurance, the user needs to create a Secure Channel for trusted communication with the remote TEE. In many cases, the user also wants Secret Provisioning to transparently provision secret keys and other sensitive data to the remote TEE.

Graphene provides support for all three levels of attestation flows:

1. Remote Attestation is exposed to the application via /dev/attestation pseudo-filesystem. Remote attestation in Graphene uses the Intel SGX PSW’s AESM service and the Intel DCAP libraries under the hood.
2. Secure Channel is constructed using the RA-TLS libraries. RA-TLS uses raw /dev/attestation pseudo-files under the hood.
3. Secret Provisioning is built using the Secret Provisioning libraries. These libraries use RA-TLS under the hood.

Applications running under Graphene can use each of the above three levels to build their attestation flows. Each next level builds on the previous one and exposes a simpler API to the application (but also is more restricted in its functionality).

## Remote Attestation flows for EPID and DCAP¶

Remote attestation in Intel SGX comes in two flavours: EPID and DCAP. The former is used in client machines whereas the latter is used in data center environments. The details of these flows will be described in the following sections. Here we give a high-level description of both of these remote attestation schemes.

The diagram above shows EPID based remote attestation. The user application runs in an SGX enclave on a remote untusted machine, whereas the end user waits for the attestation evidence from this enclave on a trusted machine.

EPID based remote attestation starts with the enclavized user application opening the special file /dev/attestation/user_report_data for write (step 1). Under the hood, Graphene uses the EREPORT hardware instruction to generate an SGX Report (step 2). After the SGX report is generated, the application opens another special file /dev/attestation/quote for read (step 3). Under the hood, Graphene communicates with the Quoting Enclave to receive the SGX Quote (step 4). In turn, the Quoting Enclave uses the EPID key provided by the Provisioning Enclave (step 5, only during initial deployment of this SGX machine). The Provisioning Enclave requests the EPID key associated with this SGX machine from the internet-accessible Intel Provisioning Service (step 6, only during initial deployment). The Quoting Enclave generates the SGX quote from the provided-by-application SGX report and sends it back to the enclavized user application. The application stores this SGX quote in its enclave memory and can later send it to the remote user (verifier) upon request. When the remote user wants to validate the SGX enclave, it requests remote attestation with it, and the enclavized application forwards the SGX quote to the remote trusted machine (step 8). Finally, the remote user consults the Intel Attestation Service (by forwarding the SGX quote to this service), which returns back whether this SGX quote can be trusted (step 9). Finally, the remote user also verifies the enclave measurements embedded in the SGX quote against the expected ones. After this verification procedure, the remote user can trust the SGX enclave on the untrusted machine and start sending inputs/receiving enclave outputs.

The diagram above shows DCAP based remote attestation. The DCAP flows are very similar to EPID flows, but rather than using the EPID keys and consulting the Intel Attestation Service, the DCAP flows instead use the classic PKI with X.509 certificate chains.

The DCAP flows are the same as EPID flows in steps 1-4. However, the Quoting Enclave talks to the Provisioning Certification Enclave (PCE) rather than the Provisioning Enclave (step 5). The PCE uses another Intel service called Intel Provisioning Certification Service (PCS) to obtain the attestation collateral: attestation certificates and certificate revocation lists for the SGX machine (step 6). Also, the end user does not need to consult a web service from Intel each time a new SGX quote arrives – instead the end user periodically fetches the DCAP attestation certificates and caches them on a local machine (preliminary step 0). When the SGX quote arrives, the user compares the certificates embedded in the quote against these cached certificates (step 9).

## Low-level /dev/attestation interface¶

The first level of the /dev/attestation pseudo-filesystem exposes the low-level abstractions of attestation report and attestation quote objects (SGX Report and SGX Quote in SGX parlance), in the form of two pseudo-files:

• /dev/attestation/user_report_data pseudo-file can be opened for read or write access. Typically, it is opened and written into before opening and reading from the /dev/attestation/quote file, such that the latter can use the user-provided report data. In case of Intel SGX, user report data can be an arbitrary string of size 64B; this string is embedded in the SGX quote.

• /dev/attestation/quote pseudo-file can be opened for read access. Before opening this file for read, user report data must be written into /dev/attestation/user_report_data. Otherwise the obtained attestation quote will contain incorrect or stale user report data.

The resulting quote can be passed to another TEE or service as part of the remote attestation flow. In case of Intel SGX, the obtained quote is the SGX quote created by the Quoting Enclave.

Using these two files, the user application may construct arbitrary attestation flows. Typically, the application will write a secure hash of the unique public key generated by the TEE instance into /dev/attestation/user_report_data, such that when the remote user receives the SGX quote (with user report data embedded), the remote user can tie the TEE instance to the TEE’s public key.

In case of Intel SGX, the /dev/attestation/user_report_data pseudo-file uses the EREPORT hardware instruction and the /dev/attestation/quote pseudo-file uses the Quoting Enclave accessed via the AESM service.

Please note that these files are process-local, so there is no need to add locking between processes when setting the user report data or reading the quote.

An example of this low-level interface can be found under LibOS/shim/test/regression/attestation.c. Here is a C code snippet of how the remote attestation flow may look like in your application:

sgx_report_data_t user_report_data = {0};
memcpy(&user_report_data, "some-dummy-data", sizeof(user_report_data));

int fd1 = open("/dev/attestation/user_report_data", O_WRONLY);
write(fd1, &user_report_data, sizeof(user_report_data));

uint8_t quote[SGX_QUOTE_MAX_SIZE];
int fd2 = open("/dev/attestation/quote", O_RDONLY);
read(fd2, &quote, sizeof(quote));

/* ...send quote to the remote user for verification... */


The remote user should receive this attestation quote and verify it. In case of Intel SGX, this verification flow depends on whether the SGX remote attestation is EPID based or DCAP/ECDSA based:

• EPID based quote verification is done with the help of the Intel Attestation Service (IAS). In particular, the remote user should forward the received SGX quote to the well-known IAS endpoint via a secure internet connection and get the IAS attestation report (not to be confused with SGX report!) back. The user then should examine the contents of the IAS attestation report and decide whether to trust the remote SGX enclave or not.
• DCAP based quote verification is done with the help of the Intel DCAP libraries. These libraries encapsulate the complicated DCAP flows (extracting Intel SGX certificates from the Intel Provisioning Certification Service, caching these certificates in the Provisioning Certificate Caching Service, etc.).

Graphene does not provide any pseudo-files under /dev/attestation for verification of the attestation quote. Instead, the remote user is encouraged to use the quote_dump, ias_request and verify_ias_report tools shipped together with Graphene (for EPID based quote verification) or to use the Intel DCAP libraries and tools (for DCAP based quote verification).

## Mid-level RA-TLS interface¶

As can be seen from the previous section, the low-level /dev/attestation interface provides only bare-bones TEE attestation functionality and does not provide any convenient interface for user-side quote verification. Also, that low-level interface provides no means to transfer any data to/from the TEE other than the attestation quote itself.

RA-TLS interface hides the complexity of the low-level /dev/attestation flows and provides a simple and powerful abstraction of a TLS connection between the TEE and the remote user (enhanced with remote-attestation flows). Using RA-TLS, the application can securely send and receive arbitrary data to/from the remote user. RA-TLS is currently tied to Intel SGX but can be adapted for other TEEs.

RA-TLS integrates Intel SGX remote attestation into the TLS connection setup. Conceptually, it extends the standard X.509 certificate with SGX-related information (SGX quote). The additional information allows the remote user (verifier) of the certificate to verify that it is indeed communicating with an SGX enclave (attester).

The diagram above shows the standard X.509 certificate generated by RA-TLS (the diagram shows the DCAP based RA-TLS certificate, but the EPID based RA-TLS certificate is conceptually similar). This certificate is self-signed because the actual chain of trust is stored in the Intel SGX certificates embedded in the SGX quote. The most important concept behind the RA-TLS certificate is that it embeds the SGX quote (in one of the unused X.509 extension fields), which in turn embeds the SGX report and the complete Intel SGX certificate chain. Therefore, the RA-TLS certificate contains all the SGX-relevant information. Also, notice how the SGX report’s REPORTDATA field contains the secure hash of the ephemeral public key generated by the enclavized application – this is how this RA-TLS certificate is tied to the enclavized application that generated it.

RA-TLS is shipped as three libraries: ra_tls_attest.so, EPID based ra_tls_verify_epid.so and DCAP/ECDSA based ra_tls_verify_dcap.so.

The examples of using RA-TLS can be found under Examples/ra-tls-mbedtls.

### ra_tls_attest.so¶

This library creates the self-signed RA-TLS certificate. This library must be loaded into the SGX enclave. The library relies on the pseudo-FS /dev/attestation to retrieve the SGX quote and embed it into the RA-TLS certificate. The library is not thread-safe.

The library expects the following information in the manifest for EPID based attestation:

• sgx.remote_attestation = 1 – remote attestation is enabled.
• sgx.ra_client_spid – client SPID for EPID remote attestation.
• sgx.ra_client_linkable – client linkable/unlinkable attestation mode.

For DCAP/ECDSA based attestation, the library expects instead:

• sgx.remote_attestation = 1 – remote attestation is enabled.
• sgx.ra_client_spid = "" – hints that this is a DCAP attestation, not EPID attestation.

The library uses the following environment variables if available:

• RA_TLS_CERT_TIMESTAMP_NOT_BEFORE – the generated RA-TLS certificate uses this timestamp-not-before value, in the format “20010101000000” (this is also the default value if environment variable is not available).
• RA_TLS_CERT_TIMESTAMP_NOT_AFTER – the generated RA-TLS certificate uses this timestamp-not-after value, in the format “20301231235959” (this is also the default value if environment variable is not available).

### ra_tls_verify_epid.so¶

This library contains the verification callback that should be registered with the TLS library during verification of the TLS certificate. It verifies the RA-TLS certificate and the SGX quote by sending it to the Intel Attestation Service (IAS) and retrieving the attestation report from IAS. This library is not thread-safe.

The library uses the following SGX-specific environment variables, representing SGX measurements, if available:

• RA_TLS_MRSIGNER (optional) – verify that the attesting enclave has this MRSIGNER. This is a hex string.
• RA_TLS_MRENCLAVE (optional) – verify that the attesting enclave has this MRENCLAVE. This is a hex string.
• RA_TLS_ISV_PROD_ID (optional) – verify that the attesting enclave has this ISV_PROD_ID. This is a decimal string.
• RA_TLS_ISV_SVN (optional) – verify that the attesting enclave has this ISV_SVN. This is a decimal string.

The four SGX measurements above may be also verified via a user-specified callback with the signature int (*callback)(char* mrenclave, char* mrsigner, char* isv_prod_id, char* isv_svn). This callback must be registered via ra_tls_set_measurement_callback(). The measurements from the received SGX quote are passed as four arguments. It is up to the user to implement the correct verification of SGX measurements in this callback (e.g., by comparing against expected values stored in a central database).

The library also uses the following SGX-specific environment variable:

• RA_TLS_ALLOW_OUTDATED_TCB_INSECURE (optional) – whether to allow outdated TCB as returned in the IAS attestation report or returned by the DCAP verification library. Values 1/true/TRUE mean “allow outdated TCB”. Note that allowing outdated TCB is insecure and should be used only for debugging and testing. Outdated TCB is not allowed by default.

The library uses the following EPID-specific environment variables if available:

• RA_TLS_EPID_API_KEY (mandatory) – client API key for EPID remote attestation.
• RA_TLS_IAS_REPORT_URL (optional) – URL for IAS “verify attestation evidence” API endpoint. If not specified, the default hard-coded URL for IAS is used.
• RA_TLS_IAS_SIGRL_URL (optional) – URL for IAS “Retrieve SigRL” API endpoint. If not specified, the default hard-coded URL for IAS is used.
• RA_TLS_IAS_PUB_KEY_PEM (optional) – public key of IAS. If not specified, the default hard-coded public key is used.

### ra_tls_verify_dcap.so¶

Similarly to ra_tls_verify_epid.so, this library contains the verification callback that should be registered with the TLS library during verification of the TLS certificate. Verifies the RA-TLS certificate and the SGX quote by forwarding it to DCAP verification library (libsgx_dcap_quoteverify.so) and checking the result. This library is not thread-safe.

The library uses the same SGX-specific environment variables as ra_tls_verify_epid.so and ignores the EPID-specific environment variables. Similarly to the EPID version, instead of using environment variables, the four SGX measurements may be verified via a user-specified callback registered via ra_tls_set_measurement_callback().

The library expects all the DCAP infrastructure to be installed and working correctly on the host.

## High-level Secret Provisioning interface¶

In some cases, the mid-level interface of RA-TLS is an overkill. Sometimes all the TEE application needs is a couple secrets provisioning into it and nothing more. E.g., an image recognition application may only need a single encryption key to decrypt the inputs (model file, classification file, image file) and the same key to encrypt the outputs. Such an application doesn’t need a TLS communication with the remote user but simply a way to securely obtain this single key from a well-known location.

This is the scenario where the high-level Secret Provisioning interface comes into play. Secret Provisioning is shipped together with Graphene in the form of (helper) shared libraries. These libraries are reference implementations for the flows to provision secrets from a trusted machine (service, verifier) to an enclavized application (client, attester). These libraries rely heavily on RA-TLS and re-use the same configuration parameters as listed in the previous section.

Secret Provisioning libraries hide the complexity of RA-TLS but use it under the hood for communication between the enclavized application and the trusted service. Conceptually, an enclavized client application and a trusted service establish a secure RA-TLS communication channel via TLS mutual attestation. The service sends its normal X.509 certificate for verification by client, whereas the enclavized client sends its RA-TLS X.509 certificate with the SGX quote for verification by the service. After this mutual attestation, the trust is established, and the service provisions the secrets to the enclavized client. The established TLS channel may be either closed after provisioning these initial secrets or may be further used by both parties for continued secure communication.

Secret Provisioning is shipped as three libraries: secret_prov_attest.so, EPID based secret_prov_verify_epid.so and DCAP/ECDSA based secret_prov_verify_dcap.so.

The examples of using RA-TLS can be found under Examples/ra-tls-secret-prov. The examples include minimalistic provisioning of constant-string secrets as well as provisioning of an encryption key and its later use for protected files.

### secret_prov_attest.so¶

This library is typically linked into enclavized applications. The application calls into this library to initiate the RA-TLS session with the remote trusted service for secret provisioning. Alternatively, the library runs before application’s entry point, initializes the RA-TLS session, receives the secret and stashes it in an environment variable SECRET_PROVISION_SECRET_STRING. In both cases, the application may call into the library to continue secure communication with the trusted party and/or to retrieve the secret. This library is not thread-safe.

The library expects the same configuration information in the manifest and environment variables as RA-TLS. In addition, the library uses the following environment variables if available:

• SECRET_PROVISION_CONSTRUCTOR (optional) – set it to 1/true/TRUE to initialize the RA-TLS session and retrieve the secret before the application starts. By default, it is not set, thus secret provisioning must be explicitly requested by the application.
• SECRET_PROVISION_SET_PF_KEY (optional) – set it to 1/true/TRUE to indicate that the provisioned secret is a protected-files master key. The key must be a 32-char null-terminated AES-GCM encryption key in hex format, similar to sgx.protected_files_key manifest option. This environment variable is checked only if SECRET_PROVISION_CONSTRUCTOR is set.
• SECRET_PROVISION_SERVERS (optional) – a comma, semicolon or space separated list of server names with ports to connect to for secret provisioning. Example: localhost:4433;trusted-server:443. If not set, defaults to localhost:4433. Alternatively, the application can specify it as an argument of secret_provision_start().
• SECRET_PROVISION_CA_CHAIN_PATH (required) – a path to the CA chain of certificates to verify the server. Alternatively, the application can specify it as an argument of secret_provision_start().

The secret may be retrieved by the application in two ways:

• Reading SECRET_PROVISION_SECRET_STRING environment variable. It is updated only if SECRET_PROVISION_CONSTRUCTOR is set to true and if the secret is representable as a string of maximum 4K characters.
• Calling secret_provision_get() function. It always updates its pointer argument to the secret (or NULL if secret provisioning failed).

### secret_prov_verify_epid.so¶

This library is typically linked into a normal, non-enclavized application (secret provisioning service). The service calls into this library to listen for clients in an endless loop. When a new client connects, the service initiates an RA-TLS session with the client, verifies the RA-TLS X.509 certificate of the client, and provisions the secret to the client if verification is successful. The service can register a callback to continue secure communication with the client (instead of simply closing the session after the first secret is sent to the client). This library is not thread-safe. This library uses EPID based RA-TLS flows underneath.

The library expects the same configuration information in the manifest and environment variables as RA-TLS.

### secret_prov_verify_dcap.so¶

Similarly to secret_prov_verify_epid.so, this library is used in secret-provisioning services. The only difference is that this library uses DCAP based RA-TLS flows underneath.

The library uses the same SGX-specific environment variables as secret_prov_verify_epid.so and ignores the EPID-specific environment variables. The library expects all the DCAP infrastructure to be installed and working correctly on the host.